Most consumers know cheap fashion isn’t sustainable—so why do they keep buying it?

Despite growing awareness of the fashion industry's negative impact, consumers continue to purchase affordable, trendy clothes from fast fashion brands and retail giants. Why is that? How can these two realities coexist?

The inspiration for this piece comes from a recent article published by Dutch investigative journalism platform De Correspondent: "The successful Bob (Designated Drinker, ed.) campaign demonstrates: Above all, don't tell people what to do." This article, focusing on a Dutch government campaign against drunk driving, is a worthwhile read because it highlights a successful approach that didn't rely on prohibition.

The core message is that when aiming to change behaviour, it's more effective to focus on removing obstacles in the environment rather than trying to change the individual.

According to De Correspondent, people have always known that drinking and driving is dangerous, but a real shift in behaviour only occurred when the ‘Bob campaign’ removed an obstacle: It introduced “Bob” as the designated driver who would remain sober. The name Bob became widely recognized through public initiatives like humorous advertising posters. This simplified the often awkward conversation about who would stay sober. The designated driver could simply say – without needing further explanation – “I’m Bob.”

While reading this, I thought about the apparel industry.

There are countless resources circulating about the fashion industry’s unsustainable practices (I have written a few myself), yet consumer behaviour is yet to take on any tangible change.

Is awareness still the problem? Honestly, I don’t think so.

Most people are well aware that constantly buying new, trendy clothes and discarding out “old” clothing is anything but sustainable. And that those dirt-cheap fashion items aren’t produced responsibly.

*In the words of sustainable supply chain advisor at Impact Institute, Leanne Heuberger, we can buy clothes for unnaturally low prices, because the actual costs of those same fashion items are paid elsewhere in the world. “Think of people working for very low wages or in unhealthy and unsafe working conditions.”

Paulien Harmsen, senior researcher in sustainable textiles at Wageningen University and Research, also argued that clothing is too cheap. “Making a garment takes time and always requires manual labour.” Harmsen believes this should be valued more. “With the low prices of clothing, we maintain the idea that a garment is not worth much, along with the current throwaway culture.”

So what's stopping people like you and me from making sustainable clothing choices?

Sustainable fashion needs to be more accessible and the norm

The simplest answer may be that the context within fashion is one of the inhibiting forces. To put it simply: People want to build more sustainable wardrobes, but the environment makes that difficult. Fast fashion dominates the market and tempts us with low prices and attractive, trendy pieces.

Sustainable fashion should be cheaper and more readily available.

One way to achieve this, as sustainability experts have often advocated and was also recommended in a recently published report on a circular fashion market, is to reflect the impact on people and the environment in the price of fashion items, a concept known as True Pricing. If the social and ecological costs are factored in, polluting fast fashion becomes more expensive and responsible fashion becomes cheaper.

But beware, we can't buy a green wardrobe. According to sustainable fashion expert Jasmien Wynants, the essence is “buy less, choose well and make it last” as the late Vivienne Westwood always said. And as Dutch newspaper NRC clearly headlined last year; the most sustainable garment is already hanging in your closet.

Text continues below the photo

Extending the lifespan of products

In a circular economy—which the EU aims to achieve by 2050—the focus is on extending the lifespan of products. How can we encourage people to cherish their garments, care for them (including through repair) and wear their clothes until they are threadbare? Perhaps we should be taught in school about how clothes are made, how to care for our items, and even how to sew on a button, darn a sock, or replace a zipper?

On a more general note: shouldn't the fashion industry itself dictate something different? After all, the current focus on trends and "new" is contrary to the principles of sustainability. What if fashion companies were to slow down, focus on high quality and think about reuse and recycling - end of life solutions - in the design stage?

While not addressing fashion in particular, Belgian newspaper De Tijd recently investigated the rigorous circular idea: “‘Can you make money with things that last forever?”

Of course, there are also smaller things that can be done to focus on the pillars of the circular economy. You may remember Patagonia's advertising campaign from years ago with the slogan “Don’t buy this jacket”? Campaigns like this can help challenge consumers to rethink their buying behaviour and emphasise reduce or recycle instead of constantly buying new things.

Offering or facilitating repair services is also a step in the right direction.

Text continues below the photo

Rewarding and encouraging circular efforts

Experts believe that behavioural change among consumers and companies should also be stimulated more by the government. Consider, for example, the simple suggestion of lowering or abolishing VAT on second hand clothing to make it cheaper and more attractive.

Furthermore, there is currently a need to act against the questionable or downright harmful practices of Chinese giants such as Shein and Temu. Jan Meerman, director of the Dutch retail association INretail, recently stated that the platforms are sending a tsunami of cheap, often untested products to Europe through mass online sales, leading to market disruption, product safety issues, and a lack of sustainability.

A similar mindset has also been shared in the US where new legislation, under the title the Americas Act, looks to dismantle the country’s reliance on Chinese imports. The proposed bill has been gaining ground as both consumers and industry experts express increased concerns over the lack of transparency that comes with purchasing from such companies.

With Trump coming into power next year, it seems such policies could already fall into place. The president-elect has proposed an increase in tariffs on Chinese imports, raising such costs to potentially be 60 to 100 percent of an import’s worth. Similarly, in the EU, discussions have also begun circulating about charging import duties on all clothing orders from outside the EU (currently, this only applies to orders over 150 euros).

But beware, consumers have a responsibility too. In the case of Shein and Temu, you might ask yourself whether you should even want to buy from them. Because it does matter where you spend your money.

Making a positive difference

With large, complex problems like climate change and the negative reporting surrounding it, it can be hard not to feel powerless. The thought "what can I, as one person, change?" often leads to passivity.

Perhaps the same applies to this fashion problem.

Yes, the situation is complicated, and sustainability is primarily the responsibility of our policymakers and fashion companies/retail giants. But it's also the responsibility of all of us. A task for you and I. Make a positive difference through small, achievable steps that you can take.

There are countless ideas for professionals: Retailers; offer more sustainable clothing in your stores. Designers; use more sustainable and high-quality fabrics and materials in your collections. Clothing brands; examine your supply chain and see how you can improve things in terms of people (social responsibility) and planet (your ecological impact). Investors, finance sustainable innovations, start-ups or textile-to-textile recycling companies.

And for everyone—consumers and citizens: make well-informed decisions. Think of the inspiring pioneers, entrepreneurs and slow fashion brands. Support brands you like and let them know that you value their sustainability efforts.

In the words of sustainability journalist Simone Preuss. Source: the article ‘To buy or not to buy: the lure of cheap clothes’ (2015)

Ask questions about production, working conditions and climate targets. Demand more transparency.

All of this has an impact, and collective action definitely makes a difference.

This article was originally published in Dutch on October 28, 2024 on Linkedin and on 4th of November in English. The introduction of this article was tweaked by Weixin Zha for FashionUnited.de and after that, translated into English. UK/COM Editor Rachel Douglass included two paragraphs for this publication.

Sources:
- The FashionUnited archive and interviews with experts for previously published background articles and the article To buy or not to buy: the lure of cheap clothes‘ by sustainability journalist Simone Preuss, from June 2015.
- De Correspondent article 'The successful Bob campaign shows: don't tell people what to do' by Emy Demkes & Hans van Emmerik, from October 3, 2024.
- The NRC article 'The most sustainable piece of clothing? It's already in your closet' by Joost Pijpker and Juliët Boogaard, from January 3, 2023.
- De Tijd article 'Can money be made with things that last forever' by Stephanie de Smedt, from March 2, 2024.
- Parts of this article text were generated with an artificial intelligence (AI) tool and then edited.